You're lending money to someone else. So maybe you buy a bond, which is essentially you lending money to someone else. That is an investment in the everyday sense of it. Because when have that asset, when you've bought that asset, it's going to pay off something in the future.
It's going to pay off some interest or some profits. And in the everyday sense, I would consider something like-- hopefully it would be-- going to college would be an investment. So education, I'll say education, because you invest that time and energy and education, it's going to keep paying off.
Hopefully by doing that, you're going to get better employment and higher wages the rest of your life. It will keep paying off. So this is the everyday notion of investment. The everyday notion of consumption, the way I think about it, is you are buying something or you're doing something that you're just going to use up in the short-term. And just by using it up, whatever that object is, if you just use it up-- and it's just going to hopefully benefit you in some way, but it's more of a short-term thing-- I would consider that consumption in the everyday sense.
So if you go buy a candy bar and eat it, you have consumed the candy bar. You have not made an investment. If you go to a movie, that is consumption. And I'm not making any value judgment that one is better than the other. Investment, at the end of the day, you're investing so that you can get future benefit that could lead to consumption.
Because at the end of the day, consumption is one of the things that might make your life a little bit better off. So I'm not saying that one is better than the other. But watching a movie, that would also be consumption. Spending time buying a book, well, you could debate whether that's education or not. But let's say you buy a book that is not educational, that is consumption. But it is making you happier.
Hopefully, it's making your life better in some way. Now, the economic definitions are related to these everyday definitions, but they're a little bit more precise.
And they make the definitions in a way that they're easier to account for if you are a nation. They're easier to keep track of. So the way an economist would define it, they would define economic investment as spending on capital equipment. Capital equipment are things like, if you are a factory, you will buy the equipment to run your factory.
You buy the robots. And you buy the assembly line. And you buy the wheelbarrows or whatever else, the things that have to cart things around. That is capital equipment.
It would be things like inventory. So for example, the inventory-- and this is still not so different. Both of these things are being used to produce things in the future, to produce future benefit. You're buying that inventory, sometimes raw material, you're going to add value to it. And then they're going to be used to produce something in the future. It includes things like even the structures, the buildings. Some experts compare speculation to gambling, but the veracity of this analogy may be a matter of personal opinion.
In an investment, you are providing some individual or entity with funds to be put to work growing a business, starting new projects, or maintaining day-to-day revenue generation.
Investments, while they can be risky, have a positive expected return. Gambles, on the other hand, are based on chance and not putting money to work. Gambles are highly risky and also have a negative expected return in most cases e. Not really. An investment is typically a long-term commitment, where the payoff from putting that money to work can take several years. Investments are typically made only after due diligence and proper analysis have been undertaken to understand the risks and benefits that could unfold.
Speculation, on the other hand, is a pure directional bet on the price of something, and often for the short-term. Most ordinary individuals can easily make investments in stocks, bonds, and CDs. With stocks, you are investing in the equity of a company, which means you invest in some residual claim to a company's future profit flows and often gain voting rights based on the number of shares owned to give your voice to the direction of the company.
Bonds and CDs are debt investments, where the borrower puts that money to use in a pursuit that is expected to bring in cash flows greater than the interest owed to the investors. As mentioned, investing is putting money to work in order to grow it. When you invest in stocks or bonds, you are putting that capital to work under the supervision of a firm and its management team. Cash, on the other hand, will not grow, and may very well lose buying power over time due to inflation.
Put simply, without investment, companies would not be able to raise the capital needed to grow the economy. Investing Essentials. Financial Statements. Portfolio Management. Mutual Fund Essentials. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Use precise geolocation data. Select personalised content. Create a personalised content profile.
Measure ad performance. Select basic ads. Create a personalised ads profile. Select personalised ads. Apply market research to generate audience insights.
Measure content performance. If the probability of either outcome is 0. Because the project has a positive expected cash flow, it might seem optimal to buy the furnace today. But it is not. Consider what happens if the firm waits until the news is revealed before deciding, as shown in Scenario 2. By waiting, the firm will actually increase its expected profit by fifty dollars. The reason the firm is better off waiting is that if the bad news happens—that is, if natural gas prices increase—the firm can avoid the loss of one hundred dollars by not purchasing the furnace at all.
By waiting, the firm is acquiring better information than it would have if it bought today. Note that the two examples would have the same expected return if the firm were allowed to resell the furnace at the original purchase price if there is bad news. But this is unrealistic for two reasons: 1 many pieces of equipment are customized so that once installed they would have little or no value to anyone else; and 2 if gas prices rise, the gas-powered furnace would have little value to anyone else.
The general conclusion is that there is a gain to waiting if there is uncertainty and if the installation of the machine entails sunk costs, that is, costs that cannot be recovered once spent. Although quantifying this gain exactly is a highly mathematical exercise, the reasoning is straightforward. That would explain why firms typically want to invest only in projects that have a high expected profit.
The fact of irreversibility might explain the large fluctuations in investment that we observe. When a recession begins, firms face uncertainty. At these times, it may be optimal for each firm to wait until some of the uncertainty is resolved. When many firms do that, wild swings in investment occur. Recent work by Ricardo Caballero, Eduardo Engel, and John Haltiwanger confirms that these factors may also be important in explaining the steep drop in investment during recessions. A firm that maximizes its profits must address investment using the framework discussed in this article.
If it fails to maximize profits, it is less profitable than firms that do, and will eventually disappear from the competitive marketplace.
Darwinian forces weed out bad companies. As mentioned above, investment ultimately comes from forgone consumption, either here or abroad. Market forces that drive irrational people out of the marketplace are much weaker than market forces that drive bad companies from the market. Accordingly, the study of saving behavior, that lynchpin for investment, is not nearly as advanced as that of investment. Because the saving response of consumers must be known if one is to fully understand the impact of any investment policy, and because saving behavior is so poorly understood, much work remains to be done.
Kevin A. He was an economic adviser to the George W. Bush campaign in the presidential election and was the chief economic adviser to John McCain during the primaries. Investment By Kevin Hassett. Scenario 2 Expected profit if firm waits and decides tomorrow.
About the Author Kevin A. Further Reading Aftalion, Albert. Cummins, Jason G. Hassett, and Stephen D. Hassett, Kevin A. Glenn Hubbard. New York: Elsevier, Jorgenson, Dale W. Keynes, John Maynard. New York: Harcourt, Brace, McDonald, Robert L.
0コメント